Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead by Sheryl Sandberg
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
As I read Lean In, I was intrigued at being able to get inside the head of a dynamic, smart woman who is one generation younger than me, and see the corporate world through her eyes. One of the cultural questions she answered for me was this: why are younger women so averse to the terms "feminist" and "feminism"? Apparently, Sheryl Sanders and her contemporaries believe(d) the following:
1. Equality having arrived, there's no need for feminism anymore
2. Feminists are man-haters who resist makeup and the shaving of one's legs
Okay, #2 was a bit tongue-in-cheek. However, having observed conditions in the real world for a few years now, Sanders has come to see that the playing field is not and will not be level until more women occupy positions of power in the corporate hierarchy. She doesn't suggest that this is due to any malicious intent on the part of men, but rather it's simply a matter of ignorance.
To illustrate, she describes having to park far away from her office door when hugely and uncomfortably pregnant. When she designated preferred parking spots to accommodate pregnant workers, no one complained. It was seen as logical. But prior to her taking her place in the C-suite, the issue hadn't been raised.
Sanders talks about not slowing down out of consideration for what might happen in the nebulous future. The example she gives, now famous, is of a young woman confiding her fears of not wanting to accept a job with a lot of responsibility due to the impact it might have on her family. The woman was planning ahead - she didn't even have a boyfriend yet.
With this example, Sanders makes the point that women, having been highly trained and educated, are waving off promotional opportunities. The jury is still out as to why, but she suggests, and I agree, that part of the reason is this: in corporate America, a woman's decision to go through pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, and child-rearing is viewed as a private matter that should not impact her ability to work long hours and irregular schedules, including lengthy and frequent travel as needed. Rightly fearing this may drive her insane, a woman who wants a family may leap off the corporate ladder at a very early stage.
Sanders argues that if a young woman stayed on it long enough to secure a more powerful position, she would be able to exert more control over her work life (a perspective the young woman must trust will happen, since at her current low place on the corporate ladder she can only see her lack of power and control.) After a few promotions, she will be able to delegate some of her work to subordinates, afford more help at home, and influence workplace policies that unfairly impact women and families. Who can find fault with this argument?
Sanders is honest about her own mistakes, and I found that charming. For example, I was amazed that, for all her intelligence and education, she didn't originally intend to negotiate her starting salary with Facebook. Luckily a nice man (her husband) set her straight, and she made a counter offer to Zuckerberg. Reams of guidance have been written about how this error could have impeded her in later years, both at Facebook and with future employers, yet she didn't know. For other women who have not yet made this horrifying discovery, please read Ask for It by Babcock and Laschever (http://www.amazon.com/Ask-Women-Power...) which in addition to being enlightening and entertaining, offers tons of strategies for preparing yourself to negotiate. And not just for salaries. After reading that book I saved $150 on furniture I was going to buy anyway, by asking one question.
But back to Lean In.
I was also surprised that she wasn't well informed about how women can sabotage other women in the workplace, particularly women in power. This is an unfortunate truth with roots in biology, and is brilliantly explained in the amazing book, In the Company of Women by Heim and Murphy (http://www.amazon.com/Company-Women-I...) which I reviewed here:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/... This also suggests the reasons Sanders was hit with such a backlash for the well-intentioned Lean In.
There is so much more to say about Lean In, but let me close with this: I enjoyed learning how this stellar corporate executive struggled, made mistakes, and ultimately learned some strategies that will enable her, her family, and the women (and men) in her corporation to thrive. It's not perfect, and sometimes it's not even pretty, but part of the lesson is to let go of the need for perfection.
The other message, younger women, is to get as far and as fast as you can before starting your families. Don't opt out just because it looks too hard from where you're sitting now. The view improves with each rung on the ladder.
View all my reviews
Madeleine Kolb (@madeleinekolb)
/ December 26, 2012Well, Lynne, you know what they say, “Great minds think alike.”
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012Thanks, Madeleine, and happy New Year!
Susan's Story
/ December 26, 2012As Bond ages, so do we all…
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012Man, he is aging like a fine wine! Great arms.
oldervoter
/ December 26, 2012Like.
oldervoter
/ December 26, 2012Loved the movie and all its “retro” references and saving the day by going old school. Smiles. Also love this passage from Ulysses. Great column. Thanks. Susan in TX
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012I know, Susan in TX, and the ending with all the old-school weapons. And people. Very affirming, huh?
Ellen Dolgen
/ December 26, 2012You just have to love Judi Dench :>)
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012Ellen, I do! In one of the latest Bonds, she got the chance to see Daniel Craig naked, and when a reporter asked about “it”, JD smiled and said, “My girl, it’s an absolute monstah.” What a cool thing to say about your coworker!
Pam@over50feeling40
/ December 26, 2012You just made me want to see the movie…an excellent review of a different sort!
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012Hey, Pam, I enjoyed the movie but I have to be honest, it targets the usual 18-35 yr old male demographic. Bring earplugs! It’s also kind of long (almost 2.5 hours); I went to the Ladies’ room at the “subway tunnel chase scene” and didn’t miss anything.
Haralee
/ December 26, 2012M is an inspiration!
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012She’s awesome!
Laura
/ December 26, 2012My birthday post tomorrow is about “are we too old”. I say never.
Lynne Spreen
/ December 26, 2012Happy birthday a few hours early, Laura! We’ll check out your post at http://imsovintage.blogspot.com/
Kathleen Pooler
/ December 27, 2012Judi Dench is the epitome of empowerment. I could have done without a lot of the high-speed action scenes , too (my age is showing!) but enjoyed the movie.
Lynne Spreen
/ December 27, 2012I thought the movie was 25% cartoonish and 75% pretty okay. But it was in the spirit of “husband maintenance,” so I went with a smile on my face. The part about the Ulysses passage was super-exciting for me, though!
oldervoter
/ December 27, 2012It did have “enough” car chases and explosions to satisfy expectations, but this is truly a 50th anniversary celebration. All of the references to the early Bond films were over-the-top fun . . . Moneypenny, Q, even the “real” car was a star! I’m not a big Bond fan as the franchise has developed over the years, but this was an homage to much earlier days. High tech doesn’t win the day, propane does. And the “aging” stars get real bumps and bruises.
My husband (to be) and I saw the second Bond film on our first date! That would be 1964.
Lynne Spreen
/ December 27, 2012I never really watched enough Bond to recognize the sentimental references, but I got the car! My loss.
oldervoter
/ December 27, 2012And you are surely too young–ahh, the sound of those words–to have seen the very first ones.
Lynne Spreen
/ December 27, 2012Not always a blessing. Look what I missed. You’re in this cool club I can’t get into. Members look knowingly at the movie and nod to each other, while I sit there, a dense heap.
oldervoter
/ December 27, 2012Definitely NOT dense. Just “too young”!
But all the references to the Sean Connery films were fun. And technology the villain, not the hero. Had to love that even if I also love what technology has brought into my life in these past oh-so-many years.
Like you, I also loved M’s response at the hearing. The Ulysses quote was perfect. And if I had been you, would have surely jumped up with a little fist pump!
Lynne Spreen
/ December 27, 2012I DID get the reference when the gamekeeper said (channeling Connery), “Welcome to Scotland.” After shooting a guy dead.
))
S. Kay Murphy
/ December 30, 2012I agree with Madeleine–great minds think alike!!
middlesage
/ January 1, 2013Agree with everyone on the great “old school” nod in this movie! The car, the music, the strategies….Daniel Craig dealing with a hard physical comeback. Wonder if young people seeing this film will get it?!
Susan in TX
/ January 1, 2013I had the same reaction, wondering how old you had to be to “get it.” My daughter, 39, got it. But she is an “old movie” fan and had seen all the early Bonds.